“We write to reflect the concerns of those who have historically been marginalized and bear the burden of unjust planning decisions that have destroyed vibrant local economies and neighborhoods of working class communities of color for over a century in our town.”
Guest blog by Lailan Huen-edits from the original are mine-for brevity only.
Dear Mayor Libby Schaaf, City Administrator Sabrina Landreth, Assistant City Administrator Claudia Cappio, and Hawkins Company:
We represent eight community-based groups impacted by the Planning Department’s decisions and policies in Oakland, and we demand inclusion of community stakeholders in the hiring of the new Director of Planning and Building.
Specifically, we write to reflect the concerns of those who have historically been marginalized and bear the burden of unjust planning decisions that have destroyed vibrant local economies and neighborhoods of working class communities of color for over a century in our town.
It is these Oakland neighborhoods that are now being most impacted by new development, and the current planning processes are insufficient for protecting these neighborhoods at risk of displacement. Additionally, we see that the lack of safe and affordable spaces for our arts and low-income communities, as exemplified by the GhostShip warehouse fire, is of life and death.
As residents and stakeholders who have been advocating for equity for decades, we have seen the disproportionate power held by developers looking to make more profit without much regard for the residents of Oakland in the political process.
We understand that many developers have been consulted in this process, but only a small handful of community-based stakeholders have been invited to participate. The City of Oakland must include the voices of those who are most impacted and at risk to achieve its equity goals.
Therefore, we have gathered requests for candidate criteria and stipulated the process below:
- A planner with a track record in community engagement and participatory processes for neighborhood planning that provides meaningful time for feedback beyond minimal-17 day-notices.
- Prioritizes equity and understands how institutional racism and environmental injustice have caused harm to working class communities of color in Oakland, including tools to mitigate past harms and create targeted opportunities in these neighborhoods.
- Has a balanced approach to considering residents and neighborhoods in decisions-in addition to developers.
- Has a proven track record with preservation of vulnerable historic, cultural and arts districts in phases of gentrification and new development.
- Recognizes that city staffers with traditional planning backgrounds are less likely to understand the impact of institutional racism, and will hire more representative staff.
- Comprehends the challenges facing the arts community currently being displaced, and brings experience to support and create safe affordable spaces for Oakland’s vital creative culture.
- Knowledge of finance in regards to affordable housing programs and a willingness to look at innovative and non-traditional approaches to fund it.
- Commits to planning tools such as specific plans, zoning changes, density bonuses, and incentives to leverage developer contributions for community benefits to include affordable housing, community retail space, local hire, and public open space.
- And to using public land for affordable housing and community benefits and openness to working with Community Land Trusts to secure permanent affordable spaces.
- Willingness to implement innovative models such as Planning Leader Institutes, Neighborhood Planning Liaisons, Registered Community Organizations, and an Equitable Development Scorecard to assess how projects will meet the city’s equity goals.
Building an Equitable Process
- At least 3-4 community seats on a candidate review and interview committee, including from these areas of expertise: 1) affordable housing, 2) historic preservation, 3) environmental justice, and 4) arts and cultural district anti-displacement.
- Inclusion of sample work, design guidelines, as part of the application review process.
- An opportunity for the public to be invited to hear from potential candidates.
- Consider recruiting applicants from cities with equitable processes such as: Seattle, Portland, Twin Cities, Philadelphia or a planning applicant familiar to Oakland and has the requisite experience to advance equity as stated above.
Oakland is at a crossroads. Our community desperately needs a Planning and Building Department that is at the forefront of innovative, equitable, sustainable and participatory policies, such as the above listed cities already have.
We are tired of being left out of the process, disregarded when we do participate, and given lip-service without follow-through. We want real accountability from the next leader who will make bold decisions to protect what we love about Oakland: our cultural and economic diversity, our thriving creative arts life as a key to our local economy, and a democratic process that includes the voices of residents.
We support positive community development and truly smart growth for transit-oriented development which can provide needed housing that is equitable and involves long-time residents. In order to develop a planning regimen which can expedite the process, all stakeholders-including residents and workers- must be included in a meaningful way with public standards for equitable development.
Please share with us the timeline, process, and opportunities for input, and kindly provide a response to our requests within two weeks.
Block by Block Organizing Network
Oakland Creative Neighborhoods Coalition (OCNC)
Oakland Chinatown Lodge of the Four Family Associations
Black Arts Movement Business District (BAMBD)
Asian Pacific Environmental Network (APEN)
The Dellums Institute for Social Justice
East Bay Asian Youth Center (EBAYC)
People of Color Sustainable Housing Network
The Wellstone Democratic Renewal Club